Hello! I am a PM working with the design and engineering teams for our company. We've moved from using ClubHouse to Jira a few months ago. We've had the design and engineering separated into two different projects in Clubhouse and was working well with the only downside being that the projects could not share a common backlog and roadmap. My design lead has suggested that we have two projects in Jira; one for engineering and the other for design. However I'd like to know if someone has a better approach? Thanks!
Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new answers.
Hi @Pablo Sergio Guevara Herrera
Yes, you can have multiple sprint boards in jira within the same project.
Once you have a jira software project, you can add another board to it with a specific filter.
Now, you will need a category/field in the issues that would differentiate between the two teams. In our case we use a select field worksteam which teams need to select to show in the correct board.
I hope this gives you some ideas.
I like Fabian's approach as well. @Fabian Lim, can you elaborate more on using the custom field to select the board? I've used Components for this same purpose but your approach sounds like it solves a problem I have where people inadvertently create tasks in the wrong project and/or board.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Here is the customfield which is a select field:
And this is how you would set your board filter:
Each board needs to have the workstream specified.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Fabian Limthanks for the quick reply. I was thinking you were using that field in some sort of automation operation to force a new issue into the correct project and workflow. I kind of misread what you meant by workstream.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
So I'll chime in here on this subject since I do this very thing in my organization. I believe the best way to do this would be a Scrum of scrums board or even a project. Then modify the filter to show what you want to see.
For example, I would use a filter for the engineering project board that uses parentEpic in (epic-1, epic-2,...) in the filter and do the same for the design project board. You could do this in the same project with two different boards as well. Whichever way you go, I would create a sprint for the Design and one for the Engineering and then have your mainboard filter be filter 1 OR filter 2.
If this sounds confusing, let me know and I'll put together some slides and a better explanation.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I get the main idea but some slides would be helpful :)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Let me know if you can access this Confluence page I created to give you a guide.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Danno, I am facing a similar challenge of organising the design and engineering work. Although I get the basic idea of what you explained but I would love to see the slides you've put together to demo it. I clicked on the link you've shared in the past but couldn't find anything there. Any chance if you could share it again? TIA.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Jyotsna Vairagkarplease try the link again. I think I inadvertently locked out that page. Also after rereading it I think you might have more questions.🤔
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
The answer depends on how you're working together with the designers. Are they part of your teams? Are they working on the sprints together? Or is it more waterfall and you need design before starting the implementation?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi! Currently it is more waterfall in nature and we want to shift away from that but need some transitioning before we do that. So short answer is waterfall and need design before starting the implementation.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
So I'll chime in here on this subject since I do this very thing in my organization. I believe the best way to do this would be a Scrum of scrums board or even a project. Then modify the filter to show what you want to see.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new answers.
Recommended Learning For You
Level up your skills with Atlassian learning
Learning Path
Apply agile practices
Transform how you manage your work with agile practices, including kanban and scrum frameworks.
Learning Path
Configure agile boards for Jira projects
Learn how to create and configure agile Jira boards so you can plan, prioritize, and estimate upcoming work.
Jira Essentials with Agile Mindset
Suitable for beginners, this live instructor-led full-day course will set up your whole team to understand how to use Jira with an agile methodology.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.