Despite reducing the repository size locally (as shown by git count-objects -v
indicating a size of 494 KB), Bitbucket still displays the repository size as 3.8 GB. This discrepancy suggests that stale or unnecessary data may still be present on the remote repository or that Bitbucket’s repository size calculation hasn’t updated correctly.
Expected Result: The repository size displayed on Bitbucket aligns with the local repository size (494 KB).
Actual Result: Bitbucket reports the repository size as 3.8 GB, which is significantly larger than the local size.
@Elumalai Shanmugam Welcome to the Atlassian community
Per the support article here: https://support.atlassian.com/bitbucket-cloud/docs/reduce-repository-size/#Garbage-collection-is-automatically-run-to-delete-dangling-commits Garbage collection probably needs to be run. You can submit a support issue with Atlassian making this request. If you are on a free plan let me know and I can escalate it to Atlassian here.
I've just executed a gc against your repository which has reduced the size from 3.8GB to 570KB.
I can confirm that your total workspace size is only 302.4MB which is well within the 1GB limit that will be enforced in April:
Cheers!
- Ben (Bitbucket Cloud Support)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.