Will the branch permission pattern foo/bar** match foo/barbat or does ** only match strictly separated path elements (e.g. foo/bar/bat)? https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/STASH/Branch+permission+patterns isn't totally clear about that.
Hi,
Stash is using Spring's AntPathMatcher
internally which is based on Ant patterns. From Ant's documentation:
/test/**
matches all files/directories under /test/
, such as /test/x.java
, or /test/foo/bar/xyz.html
, but not /xyz.xml
.
which means foo/bar** matches foo/barbat.
Kind regards,
Michael
That's how I read it as well. But it's not totally clear from the spec. It doesn't explicitly mention the case of ** being preceded by anything other than / or nothing.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You're right, it's not clear from the spec. I can only tell from the implementation side how AntPathMatcher is working. Only the code tells the truth :-)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Jan,
Thank you for your question.
Based on the documentation you have mentioned and in your inquire, it seems you are interested on knowing how to refer any branch that starts with foo/bar (i.e.: foo/bar, foo/barbat, foo/bare). If so, you could use the following pattern:
foo/bar*
PROJECT-* | Matches any branch or tag named PROJECT-*, even in a name space. e.g. refs/heads/PROJECT-1234, refs/heads/stable/PROJECT-new or refs/tags/PROJECT-1.1 |
If you find this answer useful, I would kindly ask you to accept it so the same will be visible to others who might be facing the same issue you have inquired.
Thank you for your understanding.
—
Kind regards,
Rafael P. Sperafico
Atlassian Support
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
That's true, but not really what I was asking. I'd like to know whether foo/bar** is guaranteed to match foo/barbat (as well as foo/bar/bat, foo/barbat/baz, etc). It's not entirely clear from the spec, at least there is no example mentioning this case.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.