Can we have such a structure ? A parent project (like a group name) and then we can have sub-projects under that project, and then we can have repositories under each sub-project?
Hi @Anishka With Bitbucket 5.13 we introduced Labels feature that you might use to categorize the repositories. Please take a look at official release notes: https://confluence.atlassian.com/bitbucketserver/bitbucket-server-5-13-release-notes-953131455.html#BitbucketServer5.13releasenotes-Addinglabelstoarepository,availablenowinBitbucketServer5.13
Thanks,
Maciej
My organisation is looking into moving from gitlab to bitbucket and this is a major issue. Some repositories within a project have the same name and are distinguished by their ownership to a subgroup. As a result, we must look into each repository and rename many to reflect their previous ownership. Labels don’t help.
Down the road, I’d also prefer to have repositories organized as:
FrontEnd/SDK
BackEnd/SDK
As oppose to flat list with names like "FrontEnd_SDK" even if labels can help with the search.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Unfortunately, it's impossible to organize my projects in bitbucket using its capabilities.
I really thought your workspaces would do what I needed, so I structured my projects as a workspace per client, broken down by projects and repositories. BUT...then I found out that the subscription plans are attached to the workspace, there's no concept of an organization so if I have three clients and I want build minutes for each of them, I'm buying three different bitbucket plans.
Because of this, and because I like to have structure in everything I do, I'm in the process of moving my projects into Gitlab from Bitbucket.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Luis thank to your solution rename repository like a old Gitlab structure but take more effort to migration.
Ex. Gitlab Structure
Group: CompanyA <--- Billing plan here
Sub-Group: ServiceA/SystemA/AppA
Repository: infrastructure
Sub-Group: ServiceB/SystemB/AppB
Repository: infrastructure
When migrate to BitBucket it break the structure to almost flat level.
Workspace: CompanyA <--- Billing plan here
Project: ServiceA
Repository: SystemA_AppA_infrastructure
Project: ServiceB
Repository: SystemB_AppB_infrastructure
Every wall is a door.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.