Are we heading back to the bad old days when each individual plugin/add-on has to be manually massaged into place after the due diligence of testing each and every macro on each and every page?
I would have thought that Atlassian would have introduced a mandatory stipulation of UPM compatability?
I really hope that this is not a trend!
Hi Dave,
Looks like there was a problem with the latest release of Gliffy on the marketplace, we've taken this up with Gliffy themselves and we should have it fixed for you soon.
This is related specifically to how this plugin was uploaded to the marketplace and is definitely not a new trend :)
Cheers,
Michael
Andddddd it's now fixed.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks for the very fast response and positive action Michael.
Does that "fix" the filtering at the marketplace end that allows a "problem" plugin to be uploaded and then to be forwarded onto the "Available Updates" list or is it a "fix" for the plugin itself?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dave,
Sorry for the late reply. The problem was that the plugin wasn't marked as being able to be installed automatically, which allows it to be installed via the 'Available Updates' list rather than uploading the jar file manually.
It's not a problem with the plugin itself, just how it was uploaded.
Any other questions, just ask.
Cheers,
Michael
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.