Hi there, how do you handle the challenge that in Jira Product Discovery you cannot differentiate between Epics and tasks/subtasks, but only create either epics or tasks when you "transfer" an item from Jira Product Discovery to standard Jira
Hi @[deleted] ,
I believe when a JPD idea creates a Jira delivery, you can select any of the available of issue types under the Jira project selected (Epic, Task, Bug, etc.).
But I don't believe it's possible to create a subtask or child issue from a JPD idea since these are managed through the issue after the Jira issue is created.
Not sure if that helps so if you can clarify the issue a bit more, or how you are hoping to handle the challenge, it might help with providing additional information.
Hi Nick, yes, this helps a lot, thanks for clarifying
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I think what you are asking here I went through the same level of thinking. There has been some discussion on here around a Hierarchy in JPD to help you to manage different size Ideas but for now at least I have just rationalised this by using description and Labels for the different sized ideas.
For example if I have a large Initiative (or Epic) Idea I will label it with "Epic" and put [Epic] in the Idea summary for visual scanning purposes. WHen it comes time to transfer this to Jira I simply create the multiple features associated with the Idea for Release 1 (or MVP) so that from with JPD I can then see the several features that make up that epic.
Where required I then create any other features not part of MVP associated with that Epic as a new Idea in JPD and tag them as "Feature" with [Feature] in the Idea summary. And that feature goes through Discovery at the feature level.
Its not pretty but it works for now until the team figure out a clear way to do a hierarchy.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Awesome, we will try to do the same, sounds like a pragmatic workaround. thank you!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.