Are there plans for expanding the number and/or flexibility of the fields associated with Connections?
This architecture and flexibility of JPD Types & Connections has so much powerful opportunity. However, the field(s) that should be shown alongside the Connections widely vary depending on the context, audience, and visualization.
Limiting to a single field significantly restricts this potential.
📡 ping @Tanguy Crusson
Thanks for the feedback @Jonathan Prisant . We don't plan to change this yet (it's the first time this came up and we have other things with more demand) but we'll keep a watch on this!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.