In our classic business projects (where the kanban board settings cannot be edited, or even viewed) there is a component on the board cards which displays the count of completed / open subtasks (In the image below, there are 2 subtasks, and one has been completed).
I'd like this same information to be viewable in a classic software project, but none of the available fields I've added to the kanban card are giving me this component.
I can get a list of the linked subtasks with the "Sub-tasks" field (see image above), but none of the Checklist-related fields are giving me anything remotely like a % of completion, or a count of incomplete vs total sub-tasks...Either would be good.
There is nothing built-in to do this, and you could build it yourself using automation rules.
Here is some information and examples of automation rules if you want to try this:
https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/automation-template-library#/label/all/1453
Best regards,
Bill
Thanks, Bill. I'll try out the automations you suggested!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Anyone who would like to see this capability needs to vote on this item: [JSWCLOUD-20628] Work with sub-task/Story progress bar element - Create and track feature requests for Atlassian products.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Anne Saunders, did you find a solution for this? Did the automation work? I'm trying to solve the same thing. On business projects you can also expand the subtasks within the card, which is a very nice feature.
I keep getting this curved balls of things you can only have on business or software projects.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I ended up not implementing this at the time for a few reasons. We run out of automations before we run out of months most months, so it would have to be done on a project by project basis; I couldn't find a way to make the field compact enough for my taste; and leadership wanted my effort elsewhere.
Based on my automations "expertise" it absolutely should work the way Bill has outlined, I have just given up.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.