In old Jira I was able to identify records with data hygiene issues. This included where teams had closed the feature, but stories/bugs/etc. under it were still open. I am really struggling to recreate this in Jira Cloud. I have tried using JQL "issueType = Feature AND statusCategory = Done AND issue in linkedIssues("relates to") AND issueType = Story AND statusCategory != Done" and also tried bringing back all features that are done and then adding a filter "COUNT#subitems > 0" but neither seem to work. Does anyone on this forum have any ideas of how to do this? (I don't have script runner or add ons and can't add either)
Do you have access to Plans?
If so create a timeline view filtered to:
Set up the view to show the Progress (Issue Count):
You can then visually go down the list looking for any Features where the progress bar has anything other than Green
Thanks @Stephen_Lugton for the quick response & helpful guidance. This would work if we had small volumes of features, teams and data but due to the volume of data we have I was after something that would only show those features/stories with issue.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
My next suggestion is to try this:
Set up an automation similar to:
Create a JQL filter:
Labels IN ("Has_Open_Child_Tasks"}
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You could then add a second automation to label the child tasks that are still open:
Just make sure to check the box at the bottom or rule details to allow this rule to be run by another rule
Then you could use another JQL query to find them:
Labels IN ("Feature_Parent_Closed")
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
FYI for your example rule using the Manual Trigger and which uses a Branch on JQL:
Behind the scenes, the automation engine automagically excludes the trigger work item (i.e., issue) for a Branch on JQL by adding AND key != {{triggerIssue.key}} to prevent accidental runaway recursion possibilities.
To also detect the condition for the trigger issue, an additional Branch on Current Work Item with a JQL Condition (for Feature and StatusCategory tests) could be added to the rule, followed by your current suggested steps.
Kind regards,
Bill
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks for the reminder @Bill Sheboy I forgot to add the comment that this needs to be run manually from a ticket that doesn't meet the rule requirements
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.