I am building an url using groovy, but continue gets an error when building the url.
The url seems good. Is the length limited?
Here the log:
at com.atlassian.jira.issue.link.RemoteIssueLinkManager$createRemoteIssueLink$0.call(Unknown Source)
at com.atlassian.jira.issue.link.DefaultRemoteIssueLinkManager.createRemoteIssueLink(DefaultRemoteIssueLinkManager.java:78)
at com.atlassian.jira.issue.link.DefaultRemoteIssueLinkManager.validateUrlsForCreate(DefaultRemoteIssueLinkManager.java:335)
com.atlassian.jira.exception.CreateException: Invalid url, it must be a valid URI
2019-02-01 07:40:47,932 http-nio-8080-exec-5 ERROR ROBS 460x86816x1 1lswp51 84.105.226.128,127.0.0.1 /secure/CommentAssignIssue.jspa [c.o.s.jira.workflow.ScriptWorkflowFunction] Script function failed on issue: ITHO-137, actionId: 331, file: <inline script>
2019-02-01 07:40:47,932 http-nio-8080-exec-5 ERROR ROBS 460x86816x1 1lswp51 84.105.226.128,127.0.0.1 /secure/CommentAssignIssue.jspa [c.o.s.jira.workflow.ScriptWorkflowFunction] *************************************************************************************
2019-02-01 07:40:47,918 http-nio-8080-exec-5 ERROR ROBS 460x86816x1 1lswp51 84.105.226.128,127.0.0.1 /secure/CommentAssignIssue.jspa [c.o.s.jira.workflow.ScriptWorkflowFunction] url: https://jira.core-vision.nl/plugins/servlet/jiraxporter?template=Core%7CVision%20Release%20Note&jql=issueFunction%20IN%20linkedIssuesOf(%22(issueFunction%20in%20linkedIssuesOfRecursive(%27key%20%3D%20ITHO-137%27%2C%20%27Parent%20of%27)%20OR%20Key%3DITHO-137)%20AND%20issueFunction%20NOT%20IN%20linkedIssuesOf(%27cf%5B13200%5D%3DSW%20AND%20cf%5B13703%5D%3DMLG%20AND%20version_int%20<%202001000.0%27)%22%2C%22Fixed%2Fimplemented%22)%20AND%20type%20IN%20(%22Bug%2FDefect%22%2C%20%22New%20Feature%22%2C%2...
Any suggestions?
I don't know of a max URL limit for Jira itself. That said, it is very common for admins to use a reverse proxy with Jira and that proxy might have a limit to the size of a URL. Check out the KB JIRA elements fail to render with HTTP 400 error
In that case, there is a known limit for Microsoft based proxies that you can overcome via a registry edit that is explained in that KB. If you're not running your proxy on a Windows machine, then I would still be interested to see if you can look at a HAR file when a request like this is made to see what kind of error response you get in the browser. This information should be helpful in understanding where the problem is occurring.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.