Hello, there,
when I copy an authorization scheme for another project, it is always very tedious to swap the authorized groups. I have to remove the existing groups for each permission and add the new groups. Is there some kind of "search/replace" function or another, better, faster way?
Thank you
Martin
Hi Martin,
The roles in Jira work (more-or-less) as follows;
Roles are system-wide and define the different roles you have within your projects. The defaults are Administrator, Developers, and Users.. but I often have seen a testing role or a view-only role.
Per project, you can assign certain user-groups to these roles. In your case, the different groups are perfect for this. Imaging saying; in this project, Group A are the developers and Group B are view-only.
With this, you can create permission schemes based on roles and reuse the scheme for many projects. Assuming that a developer role always means the same permission.
Maintaining permission schemes based on roles are IMHO best-practice and the most flexible and maintainable.
Hope this helps!
Cheers,
Stefan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
We have a lot of projects with external customers. Therefore its more usefull for me to work with groups. (i think) ;-)
In each projekt there is a group with the users at the customer and a group with users from our own company. This users are always different.
But, its possible that i dont understand the system of roles and working with it?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
No, there's no replace.
This is because Jira does not expect you to be using groups in permissions - roles are far more flexible and easier to maintain.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.