Hi guys, So I have a problem with the automation rule. There's no error actually but the rule is not working properly and I'm wondering why.
Here is my case. So whenever the user creates the ticket from the Jira Service Desk, am cloning the ticket into another board (Let's say MIB board.)
So whenever the dev updates the priority field (through MIB board), I would like this is gonna happen in the Jira service desk ticket as well. So, I create the rule like below :
Then voila! When the dev update the field priority from their board (MIB) it only reflects in one side (MIB only) and does not update the Jira service desk ticket priority field.
Additional info: For tickets in MIB the linked type to Jira Service desk ticket is -> "Blocks" meanwhile for tickets in Jira Service desk linked type is -> "is blocked by"
I already tried to put "for linked issues" types "blocks, is blocked by"
but still the same result. nothing error. but this is the result :
Can you check if the values in the priority field match between BSM and MIB?
Thanks,
Aditya
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I believe the edit priority option is not set correctly in your rule. I tried in my server instance and the similar rule worked perfectly fine.
Can you check the edit priority option and send a screenshot? Attached are the screenshot from my instance.
Thanks,
Aditya
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Aditya Sastry here is my screenshot from edit issue rule :
I thing we did the same way right? am I missing something here?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Aditya Sastryis correct, it's the setting for edit issue. You should select "Copy from Trigger issue" because you want to copy "Priority" from MIB to BMS.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
hi guys @Aditya Sastry @Yanty Ghani [ServiceRocket] I've changed to trigger issue . But still facing the same issue here :'(
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I noticed that "For linked issues" type "is blocked by". Shouldn't it be "blocks"? To be safe, just adds both.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Oh My God! @Yanty Ghani [ServiceRocket] now it works!!!!!!!!!! Glad that you guys helping me out!!!
thankssss! @Aditya Sastry
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks to @Aditya Sastry for pointing it out. I was thinking of that too, but forgot to ask :D Anyway, glad to help.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Glad that it worked out for you :)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @dwike_aprilia ,
Can you check if "Priority" field is in "Edit issue screen" in the JSM project? Also, check if there's any security level set in that JSM issue.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Yanty Ghani [ServiceRocket] yes, the priority field exists in every screen I used (View, create and edit).
the security level is not set as I attach below pic :(
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
According to the Audit Log, it shows that BSM-21 was edited successfully after you updated issue in MIB, but you're saying the Priority fields are not the same for both issues, right? Can you take a full screenshot that includes this part:
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Ok, it shows success and issue BSM-21 was edited successfully. So doesn't seem like there's any issue. Can you take screenshots of issue history for both MIB-2552 and BSM-21? Make sure that it's sorted newest first.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
hi @Yanty Ghani [ServiceRocket] yes. the due date was updated for both tickets but not with the priority.
here is the screenshot from both history of the ticket.
BSM:
MIB :
PS : Please ignore update from (me)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.