Hi Team,
I have few issues for which Fixversion filed is updated with 2 fixversion names (every issue is updated with 2 fixversions)
Issue | Summary | Value of Fix Version/s field |
Issue1 | Summar1 | R100, LiveR001 |
Issue2 | Summary2 | D100, LiveR001 |
Issue3 | Summary3 | D200, LiveR002 |
Issue4 | Summar4 | D200, LiveR002 |
Issue4 | Summary5 | C200, Live002 |
Problem:
I am trying to create a Jira structure to generate view grouped by Fixversions and adding a filter to display only fixversions groups that start with Live
Structure Rules:
Filter items where attribute Fix Version/s contains Live
Group by Fix Version/s [comment - Group by Issue Field]
Group by Project
Insert issues: project in (ABC)
Output:
Summary
LiveR001 [comment - this is a fixversion level group, beneath it is having all matching ]
R100
D100
C200
LiveR002
However, I am interested to get output with fix version groups that starts with text as Live. Please guide/advise how to achieve this?
Expected output:
Summary
LiveR001
LiveR002
Structure version: Structure for Jira by ALM Worksv8.0.1
Appreciate your help. Thanks in advance.
BR,
Jayadev
Good evening,
Why not filter directly in the JQL?
project in (ABC) and fixVersion ~ "Live*"
Please let me know if it helps!
Best Regards,
Dubuisson Morgan
Hello @Jayadev ,
You will want to Group by Attribute and use the formula below.
fixversions.FILTER(LEFT($.name,4)="Live")
What it does is takes the array of Fix Versions and FILTERs out any that do not contain "Live" as the first four characters.
Please let me know if this helps.
Best,
David
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @David Niro
Many Thanks. This is great. This solution is working fine if we are building the structure for 1 project.
Apologies that, I had not shared the requirement with completeness earlier.
I have to build structure for more than 1 project (taking 2 projects in this scenario). Details as below.
Project1:
Issue | Summary | Value of Fix Version/s field |
Issue1 | Summary1 | R100, LiveR001 |
Issue2 | Summary2 | D100, LiveR001 |
Issue3 | Summary3 | D200, LiveR002 |
Project2:
Issue | Summary | Value of Fix Version/s field |
Issue1 | Summary1 | R100, LiveR001 |
Issue2 | Summary2 | D100, LiveR001 |
Issue3 | Summary3 | D200, LiveR002 |
Issue4 | Summar4 | D200, LiveR002 |
Issue5 | Summary5 | C200, LiveR002 |
Expected output:
Summary
LiveR001
Project1
Issue1
Issue2
Project2
Issue1
Issue2
LiveR002
Project1
Issue3
Project2
Issue3
Issue4
Issue5
What I am getting currently:
Summary
LiveR001
Project1
Issue1
Issue2
LiveR001
Project2
Issue1
Issue2
LiveR002
Project1
Issue3
LiveR002
Project2
Issue3
Issue4
Issue5
The main objective is to do first level grouping at fixversions and next sublevel grouping would be projects.
Appreciate your expert advice here.
BR,
Jayadev.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello @Jayadev ,
No apology necessary! It looks like there are multiple boards with the same Fix Version names.
When this happens, even thought the Versions share the name, they are still considered separate, which is why we see the behavior when grouping.
To work around this, we can convert the Fix Version to Text:
TEXT(
fixversions.FILTER(LEFT($.name,4)="Live")
)
Please let me know if it helps!
Best,
David
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.