I want sum up how many issues that status was changed from "On Hold" to "At risk" between 2016-05-02 and 2016-05-06. I use syntax "Changed" and "During", but it filtered additional issues that status changed from "On Hold" to "At Risk" prior to 2016-05-02.
My syntax is project = ABC AND issuetype = "shopping" AND status changed from "On Hold" to "At Risk" AND updated >= 2016-05-02 AND updated <= 2016-05-06 ORDER BY updated DESC
Frank, here is an attempt to rephrase your request. Let us know if this is what you want:
List any issue which moved from On Hold to At Risk between 2016-05-02 and 2016-05-06 which is still At Risk at the end of the day on 2016-05-06
If that is what you want, then this query should work:
Issue Changed from "On Hold" to "At Risk" during(2016-05-02, 2016-05-06) and status was "At Risk" on 2016-05-07
Hi Doug,
Right now, I am tracking the historical record of "Open->Ready for Triage". As a result of your formula. there are two scenarios are inconsistent with the requirements:
- 5 days ago
Status | Open [ 1 ] | Ready for Triage [ 10104 ] |
Status | Open [ 1 ] | Ready for Triage [ 10104 ] |
Investigation Details | Katie Ho to ensure this is required for initial go-live at Coastal sites. | |
Status | Ready for Triage [ 10104 ] | Investigate [ 10803 ] |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You can use the During operator
project = ABC AND issuetype = "shopping" AND status changed from "On Hold" to "At Risk" During ("2016-05-02","2016-05-06") ORDER BY updated DESC
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks Chris,
I am sorry I might not make my question clear. The requirement is that the changed issue's final status can not be changed to other issue status (such as "Closed") due 2016-05-06.
For example, an issue status has the changing history:
Open->On Hold 2016-05-02
On->At Risk 2016-05-03
At Risk->Closed 2016-05-06
At the due day of statistics (2016-05-06) , the issue should be in the summary of "At Risk->Closed", the interim change status "On Hold->At Risk" will not go into the summary "On Hold->At Risk".
I know my requirement looks weird, but it is a real request from practical work, and more challenging for JIRA expert, isn't it?
Frank
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I am not sure I completely understand but it sounds like you want this
project = ABC AND issuetype = "shopping" AND status changed from "On Hold" to "At Risk" During ("2016-05-02","2016-05-06") and not (status changed from "At Risk" to "Closed" During ("2016-05-02", "2016-05-06") ORDER BY updated DESC
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Good idea to use "not" syntax. Well, if I have more than 7 status (Open, On Hold, On Track, At Risk, Behind Schedule, Escalated, Closed), and all issue statuses can be transitioned each other, I have to write 6 times of "not" in case of any exception status.
Could you pls translate the following idea into JQL syntax? Thanks.
If {
issue type = "At Rsik" by 2016-05-06)
If
{
Issue Changed from "On Hold" to "At Risk" during(2016-05-02, 2016-05-06)
}
}
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.