Hello everybody,
I have a question for the community how JIRA is designed in the terms of dependency.
Here is an example
What is the correct understanding of above mentioned ticket:
1️⃣ - Ticket PANX-3938 has to be done before QEUI-230 and MEM-1679
OR
2️⃣ - Tickets QEUI-230 and MEM-1679 have to be done before PANX-3938
Thanks for the answer :-
Hi @[deleted] , and welcome to the community!
The image you added doesn't load for me, but going off the most common link types:
If the issue links that you posted are different, can you try posting the image again?
Hello Els, I re-uploaded the image. You can check it now. Thanks
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @[deleted] and welcome to the community. You'd want to set up something like this:
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Mark, thank you for your answer :)
I re-uploaded the image in case you have not seen it before. My questions is about when our JIRA has dependencies called "has to be done before/has to be done after".
I found out that this is confusing for my colleagues and maybe we will switch to "blocks/is blocked by" :)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks for re-uploading the image. It would seem that for your use case that your first option would be the interpretation
...and yes - I find it very rare that I need to deviate from the stock link types provided by Atlassian. The Blocks issue type is tried and true and less typing when you need to execute a query (e.g. issueIsBlockedBy = PANX-3938)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.