My team handles 3 projects which are interdependent on each other. Currently, we are using one sprint and handling the issues. I would like to know the best practice to handle the sprints as it often adds confusion in assigning the tickets.
Hi @Durga P Chavali - If these are truly independent teams with individual scrum masters and/or individual sprint events, I'd recommend creating independent sprints. This eliminates the overhead that comes with multiple teams sharing the same sprint as they can start/complete without having to coordinate the action and they still get their individualized sprint reporting.
One common practice I've seen/used for sprint naming is this:
<Project Key> Sprint n (e.g. DEV Sprint 5)
unfortunately, its the same team that works on multiple projects but has different start and end dates.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Project start and end dates shouldn't matter. If it's a single team working on the same cadence, the shared sprint is the best approach.
However, I would question whether that team is achieving peak efficiency if they have to regularly context switch between projects. Ideally teams should be focused on one project at a time.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.