Hello,
We implemented users through groups (we use crowd). Each user is in at least one group and the group is authorized for the project.
We have some users who are in multiple groups because they work with multiple teams.
On a project if a group is a member and another group is a customer (reduced permissions) no problem, unless a user belongs to both groups. In this case, it seems that the role with the least permission is systematically preponderant.
How can we do to solve this problem?
Permissions do not work that way, they're flat and additive.
Let's say you set up a permission scheme such that:
If someone is in the customer group, they'll be able to create issues in the project, but not edit them. If they are in the developer group, they will be able to edit issues, but not create them. If the customer belongs to both groups, then they will be able to create and edit.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.