I have a requirement where we want to introduce Features as an issue type with the hierarchy of Epic --> Feature ---> Story ---> Sub-tasks., where we should be able to link Features as children of Epic and Stories as children of Features (with a filed similar to "Epic Link", such as "Feature Link" which links Features to Stories).
I don't want to rename Epic. Please let me know if this is possible in Jira.
Hello,
You would need a plugin, which would let you to show your issues as a hierarchy. For example, you could use the Structure plugin:
Thank you Alexey.. I suppose this the same functionality as provided by Jira Portfolio plug-in..
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
With Portfolio, I don't think you can "insert" Feature level between Epics and Stories (without renaming Epics to become "Features"). Additional levels can be added above Epics.
Also, in Portfolio the levels are configured globally for the whole instance.
(But sometimes that's sufficient and people do rename Epics.)
Structure has a different approach – with hierarchies configurable per structure and basically the way you want. You'll need to use issue links though to represent the relationships Epic-Feature and Feature-Story. (Alternatively, you can just manage the hierarchically manually in Structure, without representing it with Jira data.)
Hope this helps!
Igor
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Igor Sereda [ALM Works] - I plan to use issue link to establish Component -> Epic -> Feature -> User Story -> Task hierarchy. In order to do this, should I be creating "relates to" link from epic to feature and then open feature tickets and again create "relates to" links to user story and then open user story tickets and create "relates to" link to tasks ?
Does it matter from which issue type ticket I create the "relates to" link ?
I am currently using the below structure automation to display the hierarchy - what are your thoughts on below? is this the most efficient way ? can this be optimized?
Note: Component 1 and 2 is dummy data that is not required in the structure.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Minali,
David from ALM Works here!
The direction of the link will matter, as well as the issues you are linking.
The "relates to" link would not initially be ideal, since both directions are listed as "relates to". This can cause some confusion when building your hierarchy (and in general).
You can rename the outward and inward text to make it clear which direction the link points. You could also create a new issue link and customize it to your needs.
You will want to establish the links as you mention "Component -> Epic -> Feature -> User Story -> Task".
The structure you picture is very well crafted!
Please let us know if you have any additional questions! The support team can be reached via support@almworks.com
Best,
David
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Manali Butey Did you use the Structure pluggin? just asking in reference to you stated that you used "structure automation" to get the hierarchy.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @rewilliams Yes, I used Structure plugin and we ended up using 'is parent of' and ''is child of' issue links between the issuetype to establish the hierarchy.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello,
I would like to know if 'Jira Software Cloud Standard' edition today in late 2023 supports this level of structure out of the box?
- Namely: Epic > Features > Story
If not, is Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management & PPM | Atlassian Marketplace my only option?
B.R.
Jakob
Product Owner
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Khadhar,
You can acquire the SAFe Epic to Feature Translation https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1218959/safe-epic-to-feature-translator-for-jira?hosting=server&tab=pricing,
which will update all of the places in Jira with the word "Feature" where the word Epic now shows up. And you don't need to necessarily be doing Scaled Agile Framework to us it. All of the characteristics you are used to using Epics will now be Feature Name, Feature Link, Feature Color, etc. Jira will use Features in place of Epics once installed. So, you then go create an Issue called Epic, which will then be just like any other Issue in Jira (i.e., just like Story, Spike, Bug, etc.) and link those to your Feature Issues. Portfolio will need to have it's hierarchy updated to accommodate the change. I have installed this Add-On a good number of times and it works without problems or issues. It might take some training of your end-users to understand that it is now a Feature in place of the Epic and if you create an Epic to be higher in the hierarchy they'll need to understand that. Features will have children Stories and Stories will have Sub-Tasks. If you do create another new Epic Issue Type then Epics will have Linked Features using the Issue Link.
Hope this helps!
Bryan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.