Dear all,
* A user sent a reply to the notification email that a ticket had been set to resolved
* The email from the user has moved the ticket status from 'Resolved' back to 'Waiting for Support'
* This is usually not an issue
* However, this ticket had a breached TTR SLA
* I'm putting the monthly report together
* I was surprised to see that this ticket isn't showing as having a breached TTR SLA
* On looking at the ticket, the SLA is now listing "2 Cycles"
* One of the 2 cycles shows the TTR SLA as breached
* The other TTR SLA cycle shows as unbreached
* In terms of troubleshooting, I looked at the TTR SLA configuration
* "Resolved" was a status to both pause and stop the SLA clock
* I have amended this so that now "Resolved" doesn't pause the SLA clock, and only stops the SLA clock
* This hasn't removed the SLA multicycle in the ticket to a single SLA cycle
* Can anyone advise please how I switch off multi cycle SLA, so that the ticket shows only 1 SLA cycle, and that SLA cycle shows as breached?
Thanks for any help.
Regards,
Stev
You were correct to remove the pause reason. However that is not the issue. What I would expect to happen under normal scenarios is that an SLA would restart. I wonder if you could share your SLA configs?
Hi Jack,
I hope you are well and thanks for your obviously constructive reply.
* Here is the TTR SLA config
--
Time metric
Time will be measured between the Start and Stop conditions below.
Start
Begin counting time when
Entered Status: Waiting for Triage
Pause on (Optional)
Time is not counted during
Status: Waiting for Customer
Stop
Finish counting time when
Entered Status: Resolved
-
Goals
Issues will be checked against this list, top to bottom, and assigned a time target based on the first matching JQL statement.
Issues (JQL) Goal Calendar
created >= '2021-10-10' and priority = Critical AND (issuetype = "Incident" OR issuetype = "Service Request" OR issuetype = "Access" ) 3h 45m Perowne Work Week
created >= '2021-10-10' and priority = High AND (issuetype = "Incident" OR issuetype = "Service Request" OR issuetype = "Access" ) 15h Perowne Work Week
created >= '2021-10-10' and priority = Medium AND (issuetype = "Incident" OR issuetype = "Service Request" OR issuetype = "Access") 52h 30m Perowne Work Week
All remaining issues No target Perowne Work Week
--
* Should I add 'Waiting for Support' as an Entered Status under "Start"?
My thanks for any help on this from you and anyone else.
Best regards,
Steve
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi folks,
Further info:
1) I moved 'waiting for support' being a 'pause the SLA clock' to a 'start the SLA clock status'
2) I let the ticket that had the double SLA cycle run until the ticket breached
* This ticket was originally logged in April
* The 2nd SLA cycle was both started and breached in May
* This ticket regrettably has appeared in the May monthly SLA reporting and not April
Rgds,
Steve
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi folks,
In case of interest to anyone;
* To mitigate rsk of recurrence of this issue, in Jira project settings under 'automation' I have disabled this setting:
Re-open on customer comment
Rgds,
Steve
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.