Hi Dolly,
There isn't any means of filtering on the contents in the history tab. You mentioned wanting to see the list of all changes which I think is the purpose of the history tab itself.
If I want to see the history of changes for a group of projects in a list view or something I cannot?
thanks!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Jack Brickeythis is a confidentiality breach if you let it open without right management.
Jira itself manages rights, so, the sames rights should be managed in the history log.
You shouldn't be able to see logs about things you're not allowed to see.
For exemple, if i use Tempo-Timesheet and I log time in the issue, you should not see this, and the amount of time logged if you don't have the rights to see the tempo module ...
And right now, you can see it, that's not logical, and that's a confidentiality leak.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
For this reason, our timesheet app, "WorklogPRO - Timesheets for Jira" provides its own "History tab" implementation. It correctly filters worklog related events from the history tab depending on your permission to view worklogs. After installing the app, you need to switch to WorklogPRO's "History tab" from "General settings" of the app. The same issue also exists in "Activity stream" and WorklogPRO also provides its own "Activity stream".
Unfortunately, advanced users can still access Jira's Rest API to see worklogs (if they have permission to view issue itself) even though they don't have permission to view worlogs. At least our implementation fixes this on the UI.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Quentin Sixt , if you feel there is a security issue you should report here - report-a-vulnerability
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks @Deniz Oğuz - The Starware i'll check. We should'nt have to pay for a basic functionnality, but, i'll check.
@Jack Brickeythe problem here is that Atlassian's definition of vulnerability is biaised, as they only count as vulnerability, things that compromises their system. This one doesn't do that... it's just a basic confidentiality feature missing.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
That could be but I think the best course to get your voice heard would be thru direct Atlassian feedback channels trust center, in-app feedback, support
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.