We have a specific requirement where we want to search issues based on specific summary fragment.
I went through the link to get a grasp of the rules in Jira search.
The issue is that the summary for our issues is not verbose, rather it is combination of many not-so-English strings with length in order of 50-100 characters, and we want to search based on some keywords which maybe clubbed in between the entire length. These snippets are not English words/stems which can scale up for the search. Our stemming is set to moderate which is default I guess, but given the requirement so specific, I am not sure if varying this will help.
Is there any other way from configuration/other means that can help us achieve this?
Looking forward to wisdom from across.
Hi Anupam,
What does your search like right now? Can you post an example?
Hi John, thank you!
My search criteria is something like
summary ~ "psf"
summary ~ "psf*"
Here, I want the summary to contain the fragment "psf"
The results with of the first query has issues with summary (replaced the key words with dummy values).
String A| String B | String E par_psf_pcie
String A| String B | String E par_psf_pcie
String A| String C | String E par_psf_pcie
String A| String B | String E par_psf_pcie
String A| String D | String E par_psf_pcie
String A| String D | String E par_psf_pcie
String A| String D | String E par_psf_pcie par_gmm par_lgcio_pch par_disp
results with second query are (with *)
String A| String B| String F par_psf_pcie
String A| String B| String F par_psf_pcie
String C | String G par_tme, par_psf1, par_psftctop, par_usbx_usb3_com, par_sa_misc, par_tbt_ports, par_psf4, par_lgcio_misc, ddrrptchtop, par_iunit, par_fmhc, par_fivr_core_right, par_fivr_core_left, par_mee
String A| String B| String F par_psftctop
String A| String D| String F par_psf_pcie
String A| String B| String F par_psf_pcie
String A| String D | String F par)psftc4
String A| String D | String F par_psftctop
String A| String E | String G par_psftctop, par_psf4, par_lgcio_misc, par_psf1, par_tme
String A| String D | String F par_psf_pcie par_gmm par_lgcio_pch par_disp
String A| String D | String F par_psf_pcie
String A| String D | String F par_psf_pcie
String A| String E | par_dmi_tl, par_disp, par_pcie4, par_psf3 andpar_psftctop
The issue is that we still have more issues which have "psf" such as
String A | String B| String C: par_psf4
or
String A | String B| String C: par_psf0 (and many more)
These don't show up in the search.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
HI John,
This is giving issues which doesn't have "psf" as well (psf-like issues?)
few results:
String1 | String2_nsf_top | String 3 --- nsf is psfish...
String1 | PSG_String2 | String 3---(PSG is psfish..)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
So sorry. You might try posting the question on this thread:
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.