Hello Grzegorz, If I could suggest one other thing (otherwise you will exhaust @Nic Brough [Adaptavist] completely) please have a look at a very good course in JIRA administration by Lynda.com here: http://www.lynda.com/JIRA-tutorials/Installing-Administering-Atlassian-JIRA/191943-2.html Only $25 and you will save yourself a lot of self-discovery and ploughing through the Atlassian documentation.
You can't. Because you don't always know what the project is, and even if you did, the user might change it, and that would mean adding/removing the fields dynamically.
In short, it's a monumental pain to try to do this dynamically, and there's little value in doing it.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
But when I have got for example 2000 project how I will find the field wchich I looking for in the screen?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Look at the project, and an issue within it.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Sorry. I don't understand this annswer. But I can't see in the search only this fields which I have got in project ? In 2000 project I could have got maybe 100000 fields :(
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Ok, that's either very scary, or you're not using "fields" to mean "JIRA fields". Could you explain? Do you really have 100,000 fields listed when you go to Admin -> custom fields ?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Sometimes it will be global field for most project. And sometimes could It beproject which have got unical fields. This field which only this field will have. How could I set tchem only for one project ? Please Nic Brought help.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Please, answer the question I've asked. What do you mean by "field" here? Do you really have 100,000 fields?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I'm worry that i will have a lot of fields. In Sharepoint all list was have a lot of unical fields. Only for this list - project. So I vorry that if I will have got 2000 project for example I will dont find a field in Screen
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Then don't create 100,000 fields. It's not going to be of any value. I think you need to step back from what you are doing and analyse it properly. Why would you want 100,000 fields? What's the model?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I told to much. It could be 8000 fields. But how to do to see only this field which are on the project? On Screen Search, and on Issue Navigator. Only this fields which are on the project. Please Nic help.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
8000 is still several thousand too many to be useful. To see what fields are used in a project, you will have to read through the screen schemes, field configuration and field contexts for each field to work out which ones are valid. Seriously, I think you've got a broken approach to your requirements here. Could you explain what you're trying to do that means you'd end up with 8,000 fields?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Now we have got a Sharepoint. With a lot of list. And a plan is to migrate all this list to Jira. That's why that a lot of fields.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
And how to use screen Schemes, and context to see only this fields what we wan't to see?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Sharepoint into JIRA? That does not make a lot of sense. Jira is an issue tracker, Sharepoint is where documents go to die. They're for very different things. I'd suggest revising your data requirements (if not the software choice) - what are these 8,000 fields actually for? Screen schemes, context and field configurations work together to present the user with fields set up in the way they need them. See https://confluence.atlassian.com/jira/configuring-fields-and-screens-187859099.html for a starter (the diagram is quite handy)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Jira with confluence advantages. But I listien from Jobin Kuruvilla that Confluence isn't for documents too.What is Your Nic opinion. It could store a lot of documents ? For about 3000 t0 5000 documents ? In Confluence.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I've worked with Confluences a couple of hundred times that size. But you need to think about what you're doing. Confluence can handle documents as attachments, but it is NOT a management system for them. If you want to store static document *objects*, use a document management system. If you want to store documents as living pages, then Confluence is an excellent choice.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
So we could store documents like in folders on the pages ?And get tchem from there ?How to import documents from Confluence Nic ? A structure of documents.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
No, that's the point. An attachment in both JIRA and Confluence simply sits on the issue or page you put it on. No trees or folders, minimal metadata, basic searches. They are not about document object management, one is for issue tracking and processes, the other for writing things (including documents) as *live* pages. The last time I was lumbered with Sharepoint, we converted it properly - wrote a script to import all the required word documents as Confluence pages. Once they became live pages, the users actually started to use them.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
And how build a driling tree from documents ? Please Nic told.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
If they're done as Confluence pages, there's a tree hierarchy. If they're attachments, not a lot you can do
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Where can i find tree hierarchy. What should i click.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Try the page tree macro
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.