I'm trying to automate transition of linked issues. The goal is to transit all "blocks"-linked issues of the current issue to the defined status. I'm using post-function "Transition linked issues" on original (blocker) issue's transition.
It works good if both issues - original blocker issue and linked issue being blocked - use same workflow. But if linked issue uses another workflow, it isn't transited. I suppose the reason is in the absence of transition with name/id specified in post-function I create in the linked issue's workflow.
But it doesn't look like correct behaviour, linked issue has it's own workflow with the transition names/ids, and I specify appropriate id for that linked issue's transition in the post-function. Why it cannot be transited?
Is it bug? Am I wrong?
Thanks for the reply!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Sorry, Vasiliy, I didn't understand your suggestion clearly. But the third case you've mentioned is an exact description of the configuration I tried. And it works good.
There's no any screens associated with any mentioned transitions.
Situation is simple:
All blocks-linked issues always use workflow A.
if I close an issue, which uses workflow A, all blocks-linked issues in a defined status are auto-transited.
if I close an issue, which uses workflow B, all blocks-linked issues in a defined status are NOT auto-transited.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Then it is a bug...
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Unfortunately, I don't have immediate access to the filesystem of Jira server. Though it's availiable on request from system admins.
What would you seek there? My question is not about the reason of the described behaviour. I would just clarify if it's known restriction and if so, I would get a reason of this restriction or write a bug in Jira's bugtracking system.
As I wrote above, it works good if both issues - original blocker issue and linked issue being blocked - use same workflow.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
can you provide atlassian-jira.log file.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Also I'm not sure that below link is helpful for you or not
https://answers.atlassian.com/questions/324015/get-remote-web-issue-links-using-java
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks for your suggestion, pareshkumar. I understand that there should be several ways to do the job. My question is if it's possible to do it using built-in post-function, which seem to be designed right for that purpose.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.