Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Selection of Epics for the Epic Link field

Jim Malgieri October 13, 2022

Recently, a user wanted to link to an epic via the Epic Link field.  Clicking on the field's down arrow produced a huge list of possible epics to link to. The user then thought to type in a subset of the Epic name to narrow the list.  Epics starting with [T] were not returned when entering a "[" or "T" or "[T]".    Searching for Spartacus also had no hits when using S, Sp, Spa, Spar etc.  The user had to use the whole word "Spartacus" to get anything returned.

Then I remembered Jira uses a form or regex, regular expressions and, as Admin, tried \[, \T and \[T\] - all of which returned matches.  Likewise, using S*, Sp*, Spa*, etc all had matches of various degrees of usefulness.

Am I mis-interpreting what is actually going on here or is there something else in play that would result in the return an empty list of possible epics to link to?

Can anyone tell me, when trying to link to Epics via the Epic Links field by entering a partial Epic name into the Epic Links field - it is now necessary to use Lucene query parser syntax? Has it always been like this or did something change? I'm asking because it seemed, not too long, that query parser syntax was not needed to produce a more  focused list of possible epics to link so

Thank You,

Jim

1 answer

0 votes
Trudy Claspill
Community Champion
October 13, 2022

Hello @Jim Malgieri 

Welcome to the community.

The Epic Link field is a field used in the Epic's child issues to record the Issue Key of their parent Epic.

If you want to search for Epics based on the Epic name or summary, you need to be using the Epic Name or Epic Summary field in your search criteria.

For more information about advanced searching against text fields refer to

https://confluence.atlassian.com/jirasoftwareserver/advanced-searching-939938733.html#Advancedsearching-textPerformingtextsearches

Jim Malgieri October 13, 2022

@Trudy Claspill , I've re-written my question to better convey the situation - I hope.  Your answer does not address my question.

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer