Hi,
solving an issue for one of my customers.
We got a structure defined in Insight object.
LEVEL1 - Department
LEVEL2 - Category
LEVEL3 - Request Type
With Jira Service Desk, we are pre-filling value of Request Type
Current solution:
1) User is able to pick valid referenced Category based on valid reference to Request Type
2) User is able to pick valid Department based on valid reference to Category.
Target solution:
1) User is able to pick valid Department based on valid reference to Request type. (This is what I can achieve)
2) User can select only LEVEL2 Categories, which are valid for both of selected LEVEL3 Request Type AND LEVEL1 Department.
Is there a way how to achieve that with Insight or do I have to stay with current solution?
HI @Tomáš Vrabec ,
Hope all is well!
If I am understanding this correctly, the user will make a choice based on two previous choices?
Their choice of request type is automatically populated, then they are choosing the level1 department.
Thus, level2 categories should be a cascading referenced field based on level1 and level 3 which are selected first (automatically or by the user).
If this is the case, maybe this documentation will help:
https://documentation.riada.io/display/ICV54/Referenced+Insight+Custom+Field
You might have to swap level2 and level3 in Insight (not 100% on this).
I think we had a similar scenario a few months ago. If I'm off track please post here or PM me on slack, I'd like to understand more.
Patrick
Hi @Patrick 22 ,
will keep posting in here, maybe someone will appreciate that.
Well I am of course familiar with Referenced CFs, but problem is that it doesn't respect "combinatoric" logic.
I got kind of random matrix of L3 inR L2 and L2 inR L1
Flow is like that:
Is there any hack how to respect combination of L3 insight field and L1 referenced insight field in another L2 referenced insight field?
If I swap L2 and L1, it works fine, because first step will eliminate all non-valid options as well as second step. But I am forcing users to first select the category and then department ... just UX stuff, but pretty annoying :-/
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.