The graph in MacHG is much prettier than sourcetree's.
It is curvy - lines are easier to follow.
Colors are higher contrast - lines are easier to follow.
Commit nodes are the same color as the line, except for merges - makes it easier to pick out commits that are interesting in the tree.
The tree is not always 'compact' - branches change direction (column) much less frequently, so they are easier to follow.
I completely disagree, sorry. SourceTree v1.0 had curvy lines very much like MacHG and I had loads of requests to change it to look more like GitX. I resisted for a while but once I changed it, it was much easier to follow. When you have large numbers of branches switching lanes a lot, the curves get very muddled compared to the angled lines.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.