If I have a branch, and rebase that branch on master, then it correctly produces a new set of commits following on from the tip of master. But it also has a "merge commit" which links back to the original branch.
Why is that merge commit necessary? Why not just have the new set of commits, rather than keeping the old ones around?
Here is some info on merge vs rebase which might be of help - https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/merging-vs-rebasing
And the official rebase documentation of git - https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Branching-Rebasing
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.