When trying to set up an application connection from Jira to Bitbucket, I'm getting "No response was received from the URL (our Bitbucket URL) - it may not be valid. Both applications are on the same host on different ports, so I configured JIra to allow all hosts. However, I have not found instructions for configuring Bitbucket to allow all hosts. I tried the same think in bitbucket.properties, but it still gives me a warning about "local host" and "restricted addresses" How can I set up the application link between Jira and Bitbucket?
Hi @Kevin Nelson
Atlassian advises installing different products on separate servers. However, if you're only installing to test features, it's acceptable, and the applink should function in this scenario too. You need to ensure the network and SSL connectivity to both application URLs. Since both applications are on the same server, you can execute the commands on the same server.
curl <Bitbucket-Base-URL>/status
curl <Jira-Base-URL>/status
$JAVA_HOME/bin/java SSLPoke <Jira-domain> 443
$JAVA_HOME/bin/java SSLPoke <Bitbucket-domain> 443
Regards,
Aman
Thanks for the response. Connectivity is confirmed. SSL Certificate is confirmed. Your reply: “However, if you're only installing to test features, it's acceptable, and the applink should function in this scenario too.”, however is not confirmed. The same server configuration works fine for Confluence to Jira link, just not Bitbucket to Jira link. All links were working prior to upgrade. Separate servers is not an option in this scenario.
I’m sure that this can be done as this is how the applications have functioned for years in the past. If not, this should be communicated by Atlassian in any upgrade procedures.
Thanks,
K
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Kevin Nelson
If the SSL connectivity is up then there might be some thing on the application level that might be restricting the application link creation. I would suggest to raise a ticket to support team to get it checked.
What I meant was that the production application shouldn't be installed on the same server, with performance being one of the primary reasons. It's ok if you're using it for testing purposes. However, the applink should still work correctly even if both applications are running on the same server.
Regards,
Aman
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I agree, it is something at the application level. In Confluence, you can set a Java switch to allow all hosts. As long as they're on different ports, it all works. However that same thing does not work with Bitbucket. I understand the desire to install applications on different hosts, but I inherited this configuration and have to deal with it. This configuration worked for many years before the latest upgrades in Atlassian software.
Thanks,
k
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.