I want to check only those that have not been assigned to Sunny, Angela, and Cherry, and have not been assignedee to other people through Sunny, Angela, and Cherry.
assignee not in (sunny,angela,cherry) or assignee is not changed from (sunny,angela,cherry)
I thought, but I think the back part is wrong.
How do I make an "assignee changed from" negative sentence?
if you mean to say you want to find all issues where the Assignee was never (sunny,angela,cherry) then you can use the “was not in”
assignee not in (sunny,angela,cherry) AND assignee was not in (sunny,angela,cherry)
@Jack Brickey Thank you for your answer.
If Cherry Angela stayed in one ticket, could it be derived as a duplicate?
How do I get rid of duplication? (I want to extract them based on the initial assignee.)
For example.
if there are 100 in total, 50 angela, 10 cherry, and 10 sunny,
the value you told me (assignee not in (sunny,angela,cherry) AND assignee was not in (sunny,angela,cherry)) should be 30, but it will be 40.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Yeon soo Kim below link will help you to understand JQl.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.