Our organization recently started using Jira and GreenHopper ondemand and I'm still trying to work out the configuration kinks. I noticed that the same issue types display different information if I'm creating or viewing the issue in Jira vs GreenHopper using the Scrum Project template. Specifically bugs, tasks, and subtasks have different "create" or "edit" screens if I open an "issue" via the Jira navigation or an "card" via the Greenhopper option (even when the issue type is the same). I can't seem to figure out why these are different and how to reconcile them. For example if I create a "subtask" from the planning board I have the "orginal estimate" field, but if I create a subtask from within Jira when I'm viewing an issue and I choose to create a subtask from the "more actions" dropdown there's not "original estimate" field on that version. Can anyone help me determine how the screens for jira vs greenhopper are controlled and how I can reconcile these?
Indeed Green Hopper has its own configuration which decides the list of fields that are shown when a jira issue is displayed in the Card/List/Summary view. This, in one way, helps to minimize the clutter on the planning board and hence this additional configuration. So have a look at this documentation how to customize the card view of Greenhopper.
http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/GH/Configuring+your+Card+Styles
For customizing the Jira on what is shown for an issue view, is by configuring the Issue Type Screen Scheme, Screen Scheme and associated Screens.
http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/Associating+a+Screen+with+an+Issue+Operation
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.