We are currently using JIRA Internal Directory authentication. We plan to move to Microsoft AD authentication with local groups.
I have a local user called "test.ad" in local groups "jira-users" and "test-users", and an AD user with the same login name (i.e. "test.ad").
I configured a new AD user directory with LDAP permissions "Read Only, with Local Groups" and default group membership "jira-users".
After moving to AD auth I got "test.ad" user in group "jira-users" only.
Where is my local group "test-users"? i don't need to rewrite local group membership.
Thanks.
Dear @nick.rozhdestvensky,
if AD is the first user directory, user directories afterwards get ignored if they keep the same username.
This is the natural overlay effect. Your internal is not gone. If you move Jiras internal DB on top position, the AD account get's hidden.
So long
Thomas
I expected the result like in Confluence - local groups are merged with AD. Is it possible in JIRA?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Not that I know. And be aware - even if the usernames are equal, for Jira they are different (internal ID). Otherwise, this would be a security breach.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.