Hello,
We have an API which creates Jira issues and then adds a SA (Service Account) as the watcher as well as the reporter. How can I create an automation to block the SA to be added as the watcher since lots of people receives email updates due to this.
Thank you.
One way to do this is to modify your REST API to not add the user as a watcher during creation.
The next way is to create an automation rule to remove the watcher once the issue is created:
Kind regards,
Bill
@Bill Sheboy , thank you so much for your response. I am testing the second way you suggested. Could you please assist me with adding multiple actions to this automation? I would like to remove a specific watcher ;
1- When the issue is created
2-When the issue is transitioned
3-When the issue is updated
4-When the issue is commented
Is it possible to have one automation , or does this require 4 automations? Thank you so much for your help and understanding.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
With the Jira Cloud version of automation, I do not believe it is possible yet to select those different triggers together.
One work-around is to have separate rules for each of the relevant triggering conditions.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Bill Sheboy- I created an automation rule (Jira Server) and can't seem to remove myself as a watcher. The rule is manually triggered, and creates a sub-task. Screenshot attached. I can remove myself from the story using the additional action...but not the sub-task. Any thoughts?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Rick Dorgan
First thing: this is a very old thread, and I recommend creating a new question, perhaps including a link back to this one. That will ensure the maximum number of people see it to offer suggestions. Thanks!
As for your specific question, this is about issue-scope in the rule as that determines what a rule action will act upon. The fix for your scenario is to branch to the most-recently-created issue when you want to change it. To do this, remove the branch for current issue (as well as the re-fetch action as it is not needed).
For example:
In my experience, the branch for current issue is typically only needed for one case: to use a single condition and keep the rule processing the remaining steps without using if / else.
For example (and unrelated to your actual question :^)
Kind regards,
Bill
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks, Bill. Your example worked great, and simplified the steps in my rule. Appreciate the quick reply. Next time I'll be sure to open a new post.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.