Building an Assets schema - Looking for how others have dealt with the assignment field.
For example, you have a laptop object type and assigned to: is an attribute of laptop. Is it better to have assigned to as a User type or an Object type that references a People schema?
Wondering pros and cons on each path.
TYIA
thank you for your question.
Usually the assignment will be used to identify the hardware and make it selectable in e.g. a customer portal. This is slightly easier in terms of AQL for the custom field configuration when having direct access to the attribute. But the extra link to a user object which then contains the user as an attribute is also feasible.
When it comes to sharing information between two or more schemas, I would tend to create separate user objects. This makes sense for example if you would like to add more data to a user, like software assignments, roles, working hours or anything else that might be located in an extra HR scheme.
Hopefully that helps.
I prefer to do the later. That way all users are associated to the same scheme., espcially if you want to import from say LDAP.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.