Hello Atlassian Community!
We’re rolling out some improvements to offer a more functional view of the request types in your service project. These updates to the table in request types settings provide admins with greater flexibility to customize their table view to suit their needs and preferences, making it easier to manage a project's request types.
To experience these updates, go to Project settings, then Request management, and then Request types. You'll see the table displaying all of the request types you have in your service project. The new functionality means you can now:
sort by columns from each column's header cell
filter the view by some or all work types, request type groups, or portal groups by using the filters above the table
resize and reorder columns by using the drag handles in the table's header row.
From the View settings button, we've introduced the ability to:
show or hide columns by using the toggle next to each column name. Note that the 'Request type' and 'Actions' columns cannot be hidden or moved
display request types in grouped sections in the table, by choosing to group them by work type, workflow, request type group, or portalgroup.
Based on customer feedback, as part of these changes we're also making the 'Request type groups' feature available to all users by default (previously it could be enabled from the Features section in Project settings). Request type groups can be used to categorize related request types within a single project, improving visibility and management for the team(s) handling these requests. Find out more about using request type groups.
We hope these improvements enhance your request type configuration and management experience.
Kind regards,
Dushyant Sharma
Principal Product Manager, Jira Service Management
Dushyant Sharma
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
4 comments