Our company has standardized on support@ourdomain.com as the sole means of email communication with customer contacts. This has both advantages and disadvantages.
Does anyone have an idea/solution to offer here?
Unfortunately there is no simple solution to this. Even if you had business logic to automatically handle the "noisy" responses, the damage is done as the issue gets created and associated notification rules will trigger.
I would recommend that for your generic messaging, you use a different reply-to address that goes to whatever mechanism you want for tracking those types of responses. This way support@yourdomain will serve as ticket intake, and responses to general emails will be handled as desired.
@Mark SegallAgree there's no simple solution, but we'll take any solution that gets the job done.
Your idea occurred to me, but it will not work for us.
We have a hard and fast rule that one and only one email address will be used for customer support. As soon as we deviate from that, the whole thing breaks down.
So we will keep looking for a solution. Where there's a will, there's a way!
My current thinking is some sort of email pre-processor logic.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Another option is to disable the ability to generate requests via email and force your customers to raise requests via the portal.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Great idea but still no go, we want that option available for those who refuse to use the customer portal.
At this point I have these thoughts:
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
If you're going to go the route of automation, I would consider a staging project with all notifications turned off that serves as the entry point for all requests and responses. Then you could go this route:
Automation #1: Legitimate requests
Leverage a manually triggered rule that your agents can execute to spawn a new, linked request to the project they actively work in and mark the original as Resolved. This would solve the issue of annoying your customers.
Caveat to this approach - Attachments cannot be copied over to the spawned issue so the experience will be less than desirable. Agents would need to either manually download/re-upload the original attachment to the spawned issue or link to the original issue to gain access.
Automation #2: Illegitimate requests
Set up a scheduled rule that cleans up any issues that were not linked after n days. This automatically clears out the noise.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
The staging project idea is interesting. Two thoughts:
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.