Is there a way to force the order for Project Automations to trigger?
Backstory: We have built our IT service desk in Jira and we are heavily dependent on Project Automation.
Example: New User
As you can see, this is highly customized and highly dependent on the automation.
One of the cross-project pieces of automation is to resolve the parent task when all sub-tasks are resolved.
Unfortunately with some request types Resolve Parent when Children Resolve automation is kicking off before Create Sub-task E, so we end up with a Resolved parent and a new Open sub-task.
How can we force the Resolve Parent automation to trigger absolutely last?
I tried a simple rename and renamed the Automation to zResolve Parent thinking it might kick off in alphabetical order, but that didn't work.
Hi @Mathew Lederman ,
I'm using an automation that looks like this one:
|
I Have a Parent Task and many possible subtasks (Phone, Hardware or Email) This automation is triggered each time any subtask is transitioned to Close or Rejected statuses. Then I created a Branch (For: Parent) where if all the related subtasks get into Closed or Rejected status, then transition the Parent issue to Resolved The component: looks like this: |
Maybe this approach could be useful for you....
I will be waiting for your comments. 😉
Cheers!
Esteban Diaz
https://www.linkedin.com/in/estebandiaz/
@Esteban Diaz appreciate the recommendation, we have something very similar. The problem is that sometimes it kicks off before other automations that create subtasks based on the resolution of a previous sub-task. Both pieces of automation trigger off the same circumstance, issue transitions to resolved. I need a way to choose in which order the automations trigger.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Mathew Lederman ,
I had a case where I needed to fire automations in order, and to solve it I created a custom filed to be used like a flag and when the flag changes the second automation reacts.
something like this:
Automation A updates the custom field CF_FLAG value on Issue XX-1
Automation B is listening for any value change on CF_FLAG custom field and if CF_FLAG change and is True, then Creates a new ISSUE XX-2
Does it makes sense?
Esteban Diaz
https://www.linkedin.com/in/estebandiaz/
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Esteban,
That does make sense, unfortunately this doesn't really solve the issue. The automation to set the flag would be the same automation that checks if all sub-tasks are resolved. It would result in the same issue unless I'm misunderstanding.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.