Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

New request form fields automatically appear in other requests issue views

Leon Gumba
Contributor
June 17, 2024

I'm having an issue in Jira Service Management where adding fields to a new request type affects all my existing request types.

For example, I have 10 different request types like Complaint, Dispute, Compliance, CRM, etc. I recently created a new request type called Legal and added around 15 new fields to its request form. However, these 15 fields now appear in the issue view of all my other request types (Complaint, Dispute, etc.), not in their request forms, but in their issue views.

This has caused a big mess, and now I have to manually remove these fields from each issue view of the other request types. Is there a way to add fields to a new request type without affecting the existing ones? How can I manage this better?

2 answers

1 accepted

3 votes
Answer accepted
Florian Bonniec
Community Champion
June 17, 2024

Hi @Leon Gumba 

 

If all request type shared the same issue type, if you add fields to a screen for 1 request type, it will add for all of them because they are sharing the same issue type so same screen scheme. You could create a new issue type with new screen just for legal, and map this request type to the new issue type.

 

Regards

Leon Gumba
Contributor
June 18, 2024

@Florian Bonniec thank you for your input!

Yes, it turned out that all of the request types were tied to the same issue type, which is why the new fields appeared in all the old request types.

I have now created new issue types and associated them with the respective request types, plus I created new screens for those.

Awesome, thank you so much for your help!

0 votes
Chris Garstin April 25, 2025

I appreciate the description of the mechanics around why this happens, but this is still a horrible behaviour.

Request Types allow you to create unique forms and issue views for tickets that share the same issue type by design. The design philosophy here is that JSM requires the ability to present different fields for the same issue type, because creating new issue types for every type of request would be unworkable.

Therefore suggesting that new fields are automatically added to a request type because they share the same issue type, while correct, makes no sense. We spend a lot of time going through pre-existing request types to remove these unwanted fields.

Apologies @Florian Bonniec I'm not saying you're wrong or that you can change the behaviour, but this functionality is painful. I'm working with Atlassian to open a feature request to change this.

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
DEPLOYMENT TYPE
CLOUD
PRODUCT PLAN
STANDARD
PERMISSIONS LEVEL
Product Admin
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events